<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging Works &#8230; Or Does it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.compassion.com/blogging-works-or-does-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.compassion.com/blogging-works-or-does-it/</link>
	<description>Releasing children from poverty in Jesus' name.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://blog.compassion.com/blogging-works-or-does-it/#comment-1530</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compassion.com/?p=343#comment-1530</guid>
		<description>@Ashleigh - I apologize for not coming back here sooner :)

Yes, I know how ad revenue works on the internet - I'm an expert at SEO (search engine optimiztion). That's exactly why I was excited about Search Kindly.

I am "known" to a lot of people online, and if I promoted Search Kindly and then people went there to make it their default search engine, and the ads were questionable, it would reflect on me. So, I do have to be careful about what I endorse. 

That's just me :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ashleigh - I apologize for not coming back here sooner <img src='http://blog.compassion.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yes, I know how ad revenue works on the internet - I&#8217;m an expert at SEO (search engine optimiztion). That&#8217;s exactly why I was excited about Search Kindly.</p>
<p>I am &#8220;known&#8221; to a lot of people online, and if I promoted Search Kindly and then people went there to make it their default search engine, and the ads were questionable, it would reflect on me. So, I do have to be careful about what I endorse. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s just me <img src='http://blog.compassion.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Giovagnoni</title>
		<link>http://blog.compassion.com/blogging-works-or-does-it/#comment-971</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Giovagnoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 12:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compassion.com/?p=343#comment-971</guid>
		<description>Yes. I believe that many of our existing sponsors could be more involved in Compassion's mission. Our blog and presence in other social media/networking spaces is to help show sponsors at all levels of involvement the many ways, both large and small, how they can be more engaged with their children and Compassion.

And I also believe there are potential sponsors, people that aren't yet aware or involved with Compassion, that have deeply empathetic hearts for children in poverty who would love to get involved if someone just told or showed them how easy it can be, even if they don't have $32 a month to sponsor a child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. I believe that many of our existing sponsors could be more involved in Compassion&#8217;s mission. Our blog and presence in other social media/networking spaces is to help show sponsors at all levels of involvement the many ways, both large and small, how they can be more engaged with their children and Compassion.</p>
<p>And I also believe there are potential sponsors, people that aren&#8217;t yet aware or involved with Compassion, that have deeply empathetic hearts for children in poverty who would love to get involved if someone just told or showed them how easy it can be, even if they don&#8217;t have $32 a month to sponsor a child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.compassion.com/blogging-works-or-does-it/#comment-967</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 03:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compassion.com/?p=343#comment-967</guid>
		<description>I would venture a guess that if Compassion's employees are Christ-followers... and that what they do they do in Jesus’ name - out of love for Jesus and love for children... then the political component of their worldview wouldn't (shouldn't?) affect their evangelical "reach".

I think that basically if you reach out to people who care about poor children, then you're getting the right people involved regardless of their politics.  

Do you believe that there may be an "unreached sponsor-group" that could be more involved in Compassion's mission?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would venture a guess that if Compassion&#8217;s employees are Christ-followers&#8230; and that what they do they do in Jesus’ name - out of love for Jesus and love for children&#8230; then the political component of their worldview wouldn&#8217;t (shouldn&#8217;t?) affect their evangelical &#8220;reach&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think that basically if you reach out to people who care about poor children, then you&#8217;re getting the right people involved regardless of their politics.  </p>
<p>Do you believe that there may be an &#8220;unreached sponsor-group&#8221; that could be more involved in Compassion&#8217;s mission?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashleigh</title>
		<link>http://blog.compassion.com/blogging-works-or-does-it/#comment-960</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashleigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 14:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compassion.com/?p=343#comment-960</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Ok, awesome, I completely understand what you're trying to say now!  I appreciate the clarification.

While I do think employees' political ideologies contribute to the organizational culture of Compassion and therefore affects its work, I think that's inevitable and not necessarily a bad thing.  And while for me, issues of poverty liberalized me a few years ago, I have several friends that care for the same issues that identify as conservative.  

I don't know if you know the political make-up of Compassion or how you would find out, but I think it could actually be useful in terms of understanding what kind of evangelicals you are effectively reaching.  I hope Compassion does know/remember that evangelical politics are much broader than the media stereotype and is able to get people of all stripes involved in its mission.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Ok, awesome, I completely understand what you&#8217;re trying to say now!  I appreciate the clarification.</p>
<p>While I do think employees&#8217; political ideologies contribute to the organizational culture of Compassion and therefore affects its work, I think that&#8217;s inevitable and not necessarily a bad thing.  And while for me, issues of poverty liberalized me a few years ago, I have several friends that care for the same issues that identify as conservative.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if you know the political make-up of Compassion or how you would find out, but I think it could actually be useful in terms of understanding what kind of evangelicals you are effectively reaching.  I hope Compassion does know/remember that evangelical politics are much broader than the media stereotype and is able to get people of all stripes involved in its mission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Giovagnoni</title>
		<link>http://blog.compassion.com/blogging-works-or-does-it/#comment-959</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Giovagnoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compassion.com/?p=343#comment-959</guid>
		<description>Aaah! Now I see the perspective you're asking from. 

When I called Compassion a conservative Christian organization I applied that label based on the fact that many of my co-workers identify themselves as conservatives; thus, I extended that association to Compassion. That's the relative part. It's based on my perspective and experience.

I do not think that all Compassion supporters identify as conservative. I know all Compassion employees don't identify as conservative. 

Compassion does not have a political agenda. It's mission is  100 percent children - releasing children from poverty ... and doing it in Jesus' name. The two parts are inseparable.

The ideology that roots the organization is love. Love for Jesus. Love for children. Love for the Body of Christ. Love for each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaah! Now I see the perspective you&#8217;re asking from. </p>
<p>When I called Compassion a conservative Christian organization I applied that label based on the fact that many of my co-workers identify themselves as conservatives; thus, I extended that association to Compassion. That&#8217;s the relative part. It&#8217;s based on my perspective and experience.</p>
<p>I do not think that all Compassion supporters identify as conservative. I know all Compassion employees don&#8217;t identify as conservative. </p>
<p>Compassion does not have a political agenda. It&#8217;s mission is  100 percent children - releasing children from poverty &#8230; and doing it in Jesus&#8217; name. The two parts are inseparable.</p>
<p>The ideology that roots the organization is love. Love for Jesus. Love for children. Love for the Body of Christ. Love for each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashleigh</title>
		<link>http://blog.compassion.com/blogging-works-or-does-it/#comment-957</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashleigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compassion.com/?p=343#comment-957</guid>
		<description>In reply to Chris:
"The [liberal/conservative] labels I apply to anything are based on their relationship to me. They are relative."

I don't know that this really answered my question.  I guess what I'm really asking is, do you think almost all Compassion supporters identify as conservative? Or do you mean to say there is an unspoken conservative bent to Compassion as an organization?  

There are other non-profits that I would say clearly have a politically conservative bent (e.g. Focus on the Family) and others that are "non-partisan" but still are essentially liberal organizations (e.g. NOW).  Others seem less politically defined but from their approach to solving problems in society, you can guess those in charge tend to lean in a certain direction-- and even if they don't say it, they're self-aware about their conservative/liberal leanings.

As a political science major in college, I'm really curious to know how you would identify Compassion-- when you speak of it as conservative, is that the supporters?  Or the ideology that roots the org?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to Chris:<br />
&#8220;The [liberal/conservative] labels I apply to anything are based on their relationship to me. They are relative.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that this really answered my question.  I guess what I&#8217;m really asking is, do you think almost all Compassion supporters identify as conservative? Or do you mean to say there is an unspoken conservative bent to Compassion as an organization?  </p>
<p>There are other non-profits that I would say clearly have a politically conservative bent (e.g. Focus on the Family) and others that are &#8220;non-partisan&#8221; but still are essentially liberal organizations (e.g. NOW).  Others seem less politically defined but from their approach to solving problems in society, you can guess those in charge tend to lean in a certain direction&#8211; and even if they don&#8217;t say it, they&#8217;re self-aware about their conservative/liberal leanings.</p>
<p>As a political science major in college, I&#8217;m really curious to know how you would identify Compassion&#8211; when you speak of it as conservative, is that the supporters?  Or the ideology that roots the org?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.compassion.com/blogging-works-or-does-it/#comment-956</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 05:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compassion.com/?p=343#comment-956</guid>
		<description>@Chris

Wow... you work fast.  I think the Gravatars look great floated right... so that if someone doesn't have one there's no harm done.

Great work!  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris</p>
<p>Wow&#8230; you work fast.  I think the Gravatars look great floated right&#8230; so that if someone doesn&#8217;t have one there&#8217;s no harm done.</p>
<p>Great work!  <img src='http://blog.compassion.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.compassion.com/blogging-works-or-does-it/#comment-953</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 01:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compassion.com/?p=343#comment-953</guid>
		<description>@Chris

Ok, by the context of your remarks it sounds like you have the WP-Gravatar plugin in use.  If you go into the settings for it you should be able to change the styling (it's the field that has a float:left).  I would recommend changing the float left to float right and margin-right to margin-left.  That would appear much less intrusive in the comments.  Ooohh... but would that affect posts, too?

We wouldn't have to be having this conversation if the identicons, monstercons, etc were built directly into Wordpress like they are in the hosted blogs at Wordpress.com.  :-)

I'll look into this further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chris</p>
<p>Ok, by the context of your remarks it sounds like you have the WP-Gravatar plugin in use.  If you go into the settings for it you should be able to change the styling (it&#8217;s the field that has a float:left).  I would recommend changing the float left to float right and margin-right to margin-left.  That would appear much less intrusive in the comments.  Ooohh&#8230; but would that affect posts, too?</p>
<p>We wouldn&#8217;t have to be having this conversation if the identicons, monstercons, etc were built directly into Wordpress like they are in the hosted blogs at Wordpress.com.  <img src='http://blog.compassion.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll look into this further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Giovagnoni</title>
		<link>http://blog.compassion.com/blogging-works-or-does-it/#comment-927</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Giovagnoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 11:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compassion.com/?p=343#comment-927</guid>
		<description>I knew about the built-in gravatar functionality, but I hadn't turned it on. When we upgraded to 2.5, I tried it and no one had gravatars. I just turned it on again, as you can see, and the only people that have gravatars are you and me :-). So I've also enabled the functionality to display a site's favicon when there a person doesn't have a gravatar so that we have more pretty pictures to look at. However, that functionality does slow down page load times. I'll have to see if that becomes a problem.

Thanks for the prodding.

If anyone wants to create a gravatar, it takes a few seconds and can be done at gravatar.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew about the built-in gravatar functionality, but I hadn&#8217;t turned it on. When we upgraded to 2.5, I tried it and no one had gravatars. I just turned it on again, as you can see, and the only people that have gravatars are you and me :-). So I&#8217;ve also enabled the functionality to display a site&#8217;s favicon when there a person doesn&#8217;t have a gravatar so that we have more pretty pictures to look at. However, that functionality does slow down page load times. I&#8217;ll have to see if that becomes a problem.</p>
<p>Thanks for the prodding.</p>
<p>If anyone wants to create a gravatar, it takes a few seconds and can be done at gravatar.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blog.compassion.com/blogging-works-or-does-it/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 02:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.compassion.com/?p=343#comment-924</guid>
		<description>It looks like you're using WP 2.5.1 (the latest... congrats) which has Gravatars now "built-in".  No plugin required... just two lines of code in comments.php, and two lines of style in style.css.

I'd be tickled to do the leg work for you.  Please email me and I'll send you short, straightforward instructions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like you&#8217;re using WP 2.5.1 (the latest&#8230; congrats) which has Gravatars now &#8220;built-in&#8221;.  No plugin required&#8230; just two lines of code in comments.php, and two lines of style in style.css.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be tickled to do the leg work for you.  Please email me and I&#8217;ll send you short, straightforward instructions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
